Tuesday August 21st 2007
The Guide Book says:
The ramparts of the Old Fort were built by Paul Kruger in 1896-99 to protect the ZAR (Zuid Afrikaanse Republiek) from the threat of British invasion. and to keep watch on the miners flocking to find gold in the village below. Reverting to a jail after the South African War, all male prisoners passed through the foreboding tunnel beneath the ramparts, but only whites were held in the Old Fort itself.
I went there on a hot, bright morning. It is near Hillbrow, so not a place you can stroll to, so Charlotte dropped me there. I ended up in a Guided Tour with three white, German-speaking women who pointedly announced that they were from North Johannesburg. I was curious about this and asked Charlotte about it later. She thought that perhaps they had come from Namibia.
Our guide was called Precious (later, she told me her preferred Xhosa name, but said that no one used it). She told us that the tour takes at least an hour and a half, whereupon the ladies asked if we could do it in an hour. I politely pointed out that I was in no hurry and negotiated that I could return to some exhibits to better appreciate them.
We headed for the Women's Prison. I thought two of the ladies were au fait with The Struggle, and supportive of it, given their positive reactions to the names of some of the white political prisoners written on glass at the entrance. But it soon became apparent that none of them were particularly interested in the prison element of the tour.
In what was the prison yard, Precious asked us to each select a white stone from a dish in memory of those who had been falsely imprisoned and those who had lost their lives fighting for the freedom of their country. We were to walk to another bowl, stand around it together and place our chosen stones amongst those already there and spend a moment in silence. Starting the tour with such a ritual seemed spot on to me. Not only for those who had gone before but also in communion with my fellow travellers. Only one of the ladies picked up a stone. The tallest of the ladies declined to take part at all, and the third said she would 'stand by' as we did it. I was now really curious about their behaviour.
Built in 1910, the women's prison has an oval atrium at its centre. A deceptive space, seemingly airy and congenial but in fact the scene of many indignities meted out to black and white women. This was designated as a 'holy place' where the prisoners could come and pray together but in reality they were asked to line the walls, forbidden to occupy the central space in case they communicated in any way. They were further discouraged by the white warders, who told them that there was someone buried under the floor at the heart of the atrium. Not true, of course...
I couldn't help but think back to our conversations about congenial space. Here was somewhere seemingly with all the physical attributes -natural light streaming in from the arched windows around the balcony; an airy communal space at its centre - but that was utterly tainted by what had happened in it. Any work done here would have to be of a deep, difficult and hopefully healing nature. I imagined one of the Sangoma’s child figures from the Stirring Waters exhibition at its centre.
One exhibit on the balcony was a pair of women’s pants. Precious told us that women were not allowed underwear or sanitary protection until a Norwegian charity provided them. (I'm not sure when, but presumably late in the day. The prison was operational until the mid eighties.) The taller of the three women spoke to me, sotto voce, as the others moved on
“But it is a prison!" she said, clearly implying that this order of hardship should be the rule of the day.
“But there is such a thing as humanity.” I replied.
“So are you telling me that all prisons in Europe weren't like this?” she hissed and strode off. Oh dear. I noticed that she had little metal-tipped bows on the heels of her patent court shoes and that they clicked as she walked.
She was obviously unsettled by the whole experience, tutting one moment and the next telling us
“I am too weak to go in there” when we reached the isolation cells.
The site is a combination of new architecture and the original buildings. The stairwells of the Awaiting Trial blocks have been preserved. Two have been incorporated into the Court building and a further two stand sentinel in the space left by the demolition of the rest of the building. The original yard, where the men were fed and strip searched, is still there. When we reached it, one of the ladies stopped at the top of the steps.
“When are we going to get to the Court? We have another appointment.”
“But this lady” (me, of course) “wants to see everything” said the most conciliatory of the trio. Precious said she would bring me back later, so we trooped back the way we had come, heading for the Constitutional Court. And I buttoned my mouth.
On the way, Precious told us how her own mother had been twice imprisoned here. The first time for trying to go to a shop after curfew, the second for brewing beer during Jo’Burg’s White by Night era – from the late 60s to the early 70s. Precious’s grandmother came to the prison to find her, only to be told that she had been sold as a farm labourer. Her family were oblivious of her eventual release and so she walked the 25-30 kilometres back home to Soweto.
The doors of the Constitutional Court are hand carved with the essential tenets of the new constitution, in all eleven official languages of the country plus sign and Braille. Through them is a foyer supported by slanting pillars and hung with branches of beaded leaves, representing the trees under which village ancestors sat to solve their community’s problems.
The Court itself has a wall built of the bricks salvaged from the demolition of the prison buildings, with a narrow strip of window running through it representing transparency. The new flag is there, as if it were flowing in a breeze. Look again. It is made of beads and wire. The carpet has been woven through with shadows as if from the trees overhead. The eleven judges sit on a bench faced with eleven cow hides, all from the same herd but with different markings, representing the different minds and opinions of the justices. One of those judges is Albie Sach, victim of an assassination attempt when he was in exile in Mozambique and in which he lost an arm. The Court is an intimate space, redolent with meaning.
“So, if I were to come here with a problem, who would pay for it?” asked my tall friend.
“You might have to pay for a lawyer, or if you were poor it would be free”, said Precious, never losing her composure. “Remember this is only for Constitutional cases. So, for example the Tsonga women who want equal rights to their men, because they have to have a king and never a queen. Or that same-sex marriage one, that was decided here.”
“What I don’t understand” said my tall friend, “is how the same-sex marriage got through when most of the judges disagreed with it.”
“Ah well,” said Precious, “the problem is that everyone has rights here.”
“And we should all know what those rights are.”
“I will get you a book about it” said Precious.
“Will I have to pay for it?”
“Of course not. It is free.”
Precious returned to present us with copies of the full Constitution, published in small paperback format.
And then they were gone, off to their appointment. I am glad to have experienced their complex responses. It kept me on my toes, mindful of stereotyping people. I am also glad that I then had some time with Precious. It was something of a treat to have a guide all to myself and we got talking about all manner of things. But everything is pertinent.
Precious had been back to Lesotho, where she was born and had been baptised the day before. She is married with two children
“…girls. I will try for a boy. But I am going to stop at three. I won’t go for number four.”
We talked about relationships and how they have to be worked at. She and her husband have been married for eleven years.
“My church, this church I am with, says I should be watching for a husband. But I have a husband. What do you think?”
“Mmmm. I think you should be wary of people telling you what they think you should do. Do you want to deny your husband? Your children their father?”
‘No, I do not.”
So here we were, two very different women, talking as we strolled back to the men’s yard. She has been a guide for six months and wants to improve her lot, do some office work, get something on her CV. We stayed for a while in what had been the Visitors’ Centre at the prison and is now devoted to Ghandi who was held there in the early 1900s.
“It is Women’s Month, you know… …When I am back visiting home, the older women expect me to do everything, get the water. They use the water for frivolous things. When visitors come to the house, they just make a look and I am expected to do everything. Because I am the wife of the brother.”
Beyond the yard and the Visitors’ block were more cells, communal and others for isolation. Number Four. Ex prisoners have been back to the prison and participated in arts workshops there. The men have made sculptures out of the grey blankets. One of a tank, another of a sofa. I found these deeply moving, that the men had returned to the same cell and created such images of violence and relaxation; of struggle and domesticity, from the blankets that had been the currency of depravation.
These communal cells had been the stomping ground of the bosses – those prisoners who had been there longest were top of the heap. They got the most blankets. They slept the farthest from the toilets. They procured sexual favours. They might get some food that was worth eating.
The rotten system that prevailed in the communal cells of Number Four was the making of the authorities that ran the prison. Precious and I talked of how it mattered not what people had done but that they were treated with dignity. Of course, the majority of prisoners under apartheid shouldn’t have been there at all. When Mandela visited, he declared
It is said that no one truly knows a nation until one has been inside its jails. A nation should not be judged by how it treats its highest citizens, but its lowest ones and South Africa treated its imprisoned African citizens like animals.
Prisoners weren’t allowed to look up. They were forced to walk with heads bowed, hands clasped behind. Mandela’s quote is placed over a walkway. You have to look up to read it.